Skip to main content

What is the user willingness towards public transport?

Various factors influence users’ decisions to use either private or public transport. Research has investigated the factors influence commuters to ride an integrated public transport system. These factors have been categorized into three: psychological, operational and policy factors.

The theory of planned behaviour is key in understanding psychological factors. Psychological factors stem from the characteristics of the trip such as the reason or purpose of a trip, the timing and frequency of the trip and the demographic of users for example, their age, gender, or socio-economic status. Older people are less likely to choose public transport as their preferred mode of travel. Likewise, as users improve their socio-economic status, so does their willingness to use public transport decline. Women are also seen to be more likely to use public transport for reasons other than commuting such as shopping etc. 

Other psychological factors include quality of services, connectivity, budgetary considerations, accessibility, and distances both from an access perspective as well as a commuting perspective. Interestingly, research has shown that users often demonstrate a psychological resistance to switching to public transport with private vehicles being preferred from their perceived instrumental function of comfort, freedom, and convenience; symbolic function of socio-economic status and affective function since users derive pleasure from driving.

Operational factors such as personal safety, reliability of connection, transfer time and information related to transfers are established as the most important. 

Policy factors can be distinguished as “push” and “pull” measures. The aim of “push” measures is to reduce the attractiveness of private vehicles, while “pull” measures seek to increase the attractiveness of sustainable public transport. Policies are categorized into legal policies, information and educational policies, economic policies, and physical-change policies (e.g., infrastructure).


Popular posts from this blog

Nairobi's Skyline: A Tale of Two Perspectives in Urban Planning

  The allure of Nairobi’s skyline Nairobi, the capital city of Kenya, is renowned for its stunning skyline, a symbol of growth, prosperity, and modernization. It's skyline is a testament to its rapid growth and economic dynamism. Iconic buildings such as the Kenyatta International Conference Centre (KICC), the Times Tower, and the new Britam Tower dominate the horizon, symbolizing the city's role as a regional hub for business and commerce. The city’s skyline is often highlighted in promotional materials, showcasing Nairobi as a modern metropolis with immense potential. This view is further complemented by the backdrop of Nairobi National Park, creating a unique juxtaposition of urban and natural landscapes that is rare among world cities. When viewed from a distance, the cityscape presents a breathtaking panorama of towering skyscrapers, contemporary architectural marvels, and a seamless blend of historical and modern structures. However, this captivating view belies a stark c...

The Cost of Excluding Women: How African countries are limiting their growth

In many African countries, women remain underrepresented in decision-making processes, whether in government, business, community or family leadership. This exclusion is not just a question of equity; it has profound implications for the continent's economic, social, and political development. In contrast, countries with high levels of female participation in decision-making consistently show higher levels of economic growth, improved social outcomes, and more inclusive governance. By failing to fully integrate women into leadership roles, African nations are, in essence, leaving a significant portion of their potential untapped. Economic and social costs of exclusion The exclusion of women from decision-making roles in Africa has measurable economic and social costs. According to a 2021 World Bank report, gender inequality in sub-Saharan Africa results in a $95 billion productivity loss annually. Countries that fail to invest in gender-inclusive policies miss out on the economic b...

Building the resilience of cities to climate change

Several measures and approaches are being explored to build cities’ and community climate resilience. Examples are adaptive social protection (ASP), green and blue infrastructure investments, conservation of natural areas, managed urban agriculture, deep decarbonisation, and built environment innovations. Adaptive social protection is defined as “a resilience-building approach that combines elements of social protection, disaster risk reduction, and adaptation to climate change to break the cycle of poverty and insecurity of communities by investing in their ability to prepare for, cope with, and adapt to all types of shocks,” including those brought on by climate change and other global challenges.   Cultural and heritage resilience Cultural heritage and resource management have become even more challenging as a result of climate change.  Recent research has focussed on built cultural heritage at risk from climate change events, including decay or even total loss generat...